Beyond generic vulnerability testing, we validate the specific attack, exposure, and abuse scenarios that actually worry your business. “Can we be impersonated?” “Is our data leaking?” “Could malware spread across everything?” — six assessments framed by real impact.
See your internet-facing assets and attack surface as an attacker does.
Verify that pricing, auth, and business logic behave only as designed.
See how well your service and people withstand phishing and impersonation.
Find where personal and sensitive data lives and where it leaks.
Validate resilience from malware ingress to internal spread.
Confirm network separation and exfiltration controls actually hold.
Each of the six assessments checks what is possible from an attacker's perspective, and hands you response plans from a security expert's. Group A fits organizations running customer-facing services; Group B fits internal-network and endpoint-heavy environments. Click a name to jump to its section.
Specialized assessments are the focused stage — they dig deep into the threat scenarios you choose. To first explore your whole organization and select which threats to look at, the Security Health Check is a better start; to assess a specific system's vulnerabilities across the board, Assessments & Pentesting may fit better.
The six assessments are focused validation, one agreed scenario at a time. For a full, organization-wide scenario and live validation of the response process — detection, reporting, containment, recovery — see Detection & Response Training.
We look at your company the way an attacker does — what an outsider can find and collect about your systems and information.
What an attacker can see about you, and what of it can be turned into an attack.
A GOOD FIT FOR Many internet-facing assets, cloud and multiple domains, right after M&A or a spin-off
We analyze the app or client to see how easily its core business logic and security features can be understood, tampered with, or bypassed.
How easily your core logic surfaces and can be abused when the app is analyzed or modified.
A GOOD FIT FOR Games, fintech apps, mobile services, IoT and smart devices, paid services
We test whether an attacker can stand up a fake service or channel impersonating you — and whether your users and organization can tell it apart and respond.
How easily you can be impersonated, and how well your customers and organization tell it apart and respond.
A GOOD FIT FOR Finance and payments, commerce, login services, consumer brands built on trust
We find the paths where personal and sensitive information can be unintentionally exposed or abused across the whole service.
Where your sensitive data lives, where it leaks, and how an attacker could reach it.
A GOOD FIT FOR Handling personal, payment, or health data; large customer datasets; privacy-regulated
The focus is technical exposure and abuse, not legal-compliance judgment.
Assuming an attacker is already inside, we test how far ransomware and other malware can spread and reach your critical assets — from a real attack-scenario perspective.
Assuming an attacker is inside: how far malware spreads and what it can take over.
A GOOD FIT FOR Many employees and endpoints, broad internal networks, ransomware is a worry
We test whether data you believe is separated is actually isolated, and whether there are paths for critical data to leave.
Whether the data you believe is separated is truly isolated — and whether any path lets it leave.
A GOOD FIT FOR Segregated networks (finance, public, defense), sensitive IP and design data, insider-leak concerns
Which scenarios succeeded or were blocked, ranked by severity
Steps and proof to reproduce each issue
How each technical issue affects the business
Fix guidance and post-fix re-validation
Findings are handed over sorted by response priority, from immediate response to longer-term work. Usually a 2–4 week project depending on how many threat scenarios you choose; exact scope and duration are confirmed in a consultation. A good fit for teams checking whether a specific threat is a real risk to them.
Targets, timing, information level, permitted and prohibited actions, stop conditions
Assets and environment, test accounts or testbeds, operational safety review
Broad collection and analysis by automated tools and AI agents, followed by expert manual validation
Material risks and priorities, technical detail, reproducible evidence
Remediation guidance, fix verification, residual-risk and exception management
Tell us the scenario you want validated. We set the scope and safety conditions together before starting.
People run the analysis and own the final call. Please keep vulnerability details, credentials, and passwords out of your first email — we'll set up a secure channel for anything sensitive.