SSQ.AISSQ.AI

Red Team Assessment

Objective-based red team exercise

We act as a real attacker to assess whether your organization notices and stops us before the objective is reached.

Rather than the number of vulnerabilities, we look at whether an agreed objective can be reached and how prevention, detection, reporting and response connect along the way. You can choose to run it with only executives and a small approved group aware.

Would the organization notice and stop an attacker going after an agreed objective? Reviewed

Whether the objective was reached, and the evidence on the response, assessed together.

agreed objective, scope, rules Objective stopped Who knows in advance aware Announced Limited Unannounced
Every attempt stays inside the agreed objective, scope and rules; who knows in advance is one of three choices.

When it fits

  • You don't know whether you'd notice a real attack

    You have security tools, monitoring and response procedures, and need evidence that they notice and stop a real attack.

  • You want to know how far one breach could spread

    If one staff PC or account were compromised, would the attack reach critical systems, and where along the way could it be stopped?

  • Your yearly tests may not look like a real attacker

    Rather than counting vulnerabilities, you want to see how an attacker chains weaknesses toward an objective, and how you respond on the way.

  • Leadership wants a test close to the real thing

    Your board or executives are asking how well you would hold up against a real attack. It can run without telling the security team, with only a few approvers aware.

What we assess

We see how far an attack gets, and record, stage by stage, how the organization notices and stops it. The response is observed as it happens and reviewed together afterwards.

Illustration ATTACK Attack side RESPONSE Response side Initial access Moving inside Critical system reached time to detect to escalate to respond no alert First detection Escalation Contain, recover
An example record: how far the attack got at each stage, and when the organization noticed, escalated and responded, on one timeline.

If agreed, phishing and social engineering, supply chain, wireless and physical access can be included within the approved scope.

To fix detection together with the attack side, technique by technique, choose Purple Teaming & Detection Validation. Purple Teaming & Detection Validation

Objectives and conditions come first

Before starting, we settle these with an authorized approver.

  • Objectives

    What the assessment tries to reach, and how success and the response will be judged.

  • Scope and limits

    The systems, people and methods in scope, and what is off limits.

  • Safety and stop conditions

    Anything that could affect operations happens only with an agreed immediate-stop procedure in place.

  • Who knows in advance

    Announced, known to a few named people, or unannounced. We also agree who approves and how we stay in contact during the exercise.

How it runs

  1. Agree objectives and conditions

    With an authorized approver we set the objective, scope and limits, safety and stop conditions, and who knows in advance.

  2. Prepare the scenario

    We prepare attack scenarios for the agreed objective and methods, and confirm how we stay in contact during the exercise.

  3. Run and record

    Playing the attacker, we move toward the objective and record, at each stage, what we did and how the organization reacted.

  4. Review together

    Afterwards we go through the attack record and the response record with the teams involved.

  5. Improve and re-check

    We set out what to strengthen and, if agreed, check again after changes are made.

What you receive

A timeline of what happened, how your organization responded at each step, and what to strengthen next.

Attack scenario and timeline

The paths taken, how they unfolded over time, and whether the objective was reached or where the attack was stopped.

Detection and response assessment

What was actually blocked, detected and reported at each stage, and how your organization responded.

Improvements and follow-up checks

Where detection and response need strengthening, and what to check again after changes are made.