SSQ.AISSQ.AI

Vulnerability Assessment
& Penetration Testing

Testing that starts from a system, or from a harm you're worried about

We assess vulnerabilities, exploit conditions and impact.

We look broadly for vulnerabilities in the systems and services you choose, and our experts confirm which paths can really be exploited and what they would mean for the business. Where a condition must always hold, such as one customer's data never showing to another, we design the test around it and check the paths that could break it.

Can our vulnerabilities really be exploited, and do our key protections actually hold?

We verify when problems occur and what their real impact is, and set out how to improve.

Reviewed

OUTSIDE The internet SERVICE Web, apps, APIs ASSET Customer data Missing permission check Must never show without permission Weakness found Confirmed path Condition held
Of the weaknesses found, we confirm which actually connect into a path to customer data, and check whether the condition that must hold stops the rest.

Two services

The two differ in where they start: from a system to test, or from a harm you're worried about.

VAPT

Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing across a defined system or service

Can the vulnerabilities in this system actually be exploited?

We look broadly across the agreed systems and services for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, then chain weaknesses as an attacker would to see how far they really lead and what that means for the business. Every finding is confirmed by an expert.

Starts from
A target to test: web and apps, cloud, internal accounts, AI services, control systems and more
When it fits
Before or after a launch or a major change, for regular testing, or when a customer or partner asks for an independent test

Bespoke Security Validation

Built around a specific protection goal

Can the harm we worry about actually happen?

We start from a harm you're worried about, such as coupon or points abuse, a tampered app, leaked personal data or one client seeing another's data, or from a condition that must always hold, and design and test the paths that lead there.

Starts from
A harm you're worried about, or a condition that must always hold
When it fits
When a specific harm worries you, when you handle a lot of sensitive data, or when you adopt a technology with no established test criteria yet

The two work together: VAPT looks broadly across a target, then bespoke validation goes deep on the harm that worries you most. Where to start is something we decide with you. Every service can be contracted on its own or combined with others.

Red-team work, which looks at how your organisation prevents, detects and responds under a realistic attack, is scoped separately to suit the engagement. Red Teaming & Resilience Testing

Looking for our former Specialised Security Assessments?

What we test

Each target has its own structure and its own ways of being attacked, so what we check, how, and which specialists take part are set for the target. Real attacks travel along the connections between targets, so we look at where they join as well.

Network boundary Outside Critical data LLM LLM services prompt injection, leaks WEB Web, API, mobile sign-in, access, logic IOT IoT & embedded devices, firmware, links GPU GPU & HPC isolation, shared storage CLOUD Servers & cloud exposure, IAM, containers OT OT & control controllers, firmware AGENT AI agents tool access, approvals IAM Identity & access AD, SSO, privilege paths
The eight targets connect inside one organisation. As the cyan path shows, an attack crosses from the web through servers and accounts to the data.
  • WEBWeb, APIs and mobile

    Customer-facing web services and apps, with the APIs and admin screens behind them, tested as one service. Sign-in, access rights and business flows such as ordering and payment come first.

  • IAMAuthentication and permissions (AD, LDAP, SSO)

    Where your organisation's accounts and privileges meet. We look at privilege escalation paths, service accounts, and how accounts follow people joining, moving and leaving.

  • CLOUDServers, networks and cloud

    From services and admin consoles exposed to the internet to network segmentation, cloud permissions (IAM), keys and secrets, and container and Kubernetes environments.

  • AGENTAI agents

    The access an agent holds across mail, calendars, internal systems and outside tools, where human approval must come in, and whether outside input can steer it.

  • LLMLLM services

    In chatbots, retrieval-augmented answers (RAG) and summaries: prompt injection, exposure of system prompts and sensitive data, and the permissions on the documents it retrieves.

  • OTOT and control systems

    The boundary between control and business networks, remote access paths, and controllers such as PLCs and their firmware themselves. We settle the method first so running equipment is not affected.

  • IOTIoT, embedded devices and firmware

    Connected devices in shops, homes and the field: their firmware and hardware interfaces, the links between device, app and cloud, and how updates are delivered.

  • GPUGPU and HPC

    In clusters used to train and serve models: schedulers and management interfaces, isolation between users and teams, and permissions on shared storage and model files.

See what we test for each target

Which harms we validate

When we start from a harm, each field has its own designed checks. Fields can be combined, and we design for concerns not listed here too.

  • Business logic abuse

    Can business rules such as coupons, points, refunds or bookings be used outside the normal procedure for gain?

  • App and client logic protection

    If someone analyses our app, how easily do its core logic and security features show, and can they be modified or bypassed?

  • Personal and sensitive data exposure

    Where does personal and sensitive data stay, and where could it leak?

  • Network separation and data exfiltration control

    Is what we believe is separated really isolated, and is there any way for critical material to leave?

  • Tenant and system isolation

    In a service many client companies share, can one company's data or functions cross over to another?

  • Protection conditions for AI and new technology

    Does an AI agent or a newly adopted architecture actually stay inside the lines we have set?

See the scope of each field

How it runs

Both services begin with the goal, scope and safety conditions agreed in writing.

  1. Agree the goal and scope

    The target or the condition to test, how much you share with us (black, grey or white box), what is allowed and what is not, and when to stop.

  2. Prepare

    Test accounts for each role and the environment, a contact for the test period and, on live systems, the hours when testing can run.

  3. Test and validate

    Tools and AI agents cover the ground; experts analyse by hand and safely confirm what can really be exploited.

  4. Report and explain

    Findings, real impact, evidence and fixes, explained both to decision-makers and to the technical team.

  5. Re-test after fixes

    If agreed, we check the fixes again the same way.

Keeping it safeTests that could affect a service run only if agreed beforehand, and if anything looks wrong we stop by the agreed rule and tell your contact. How data and evidence are kept and destroyed is settled before we start.

What you receive

From what was checked and under which conditions, to the real impact of each finding, its evidence, and the order to fix things.

What was checked

The targets, conditions and account access tested, and what this round did not cover, stated plainly.

Findings and real impact

Whether each finding can really be exploited and what it would mean for the business, with confirmed facts kept apart from signs that need a closer look.

Reproducible evidence

The steps, conditions and evidence needed to confirm each result again.

What to fix first

What to fix first and how, by how exploitable each issue is and what it would affect.

Bespoke validation adds, for each scenario, whether it was stopped or got through and under which conditions. Results do not replace a certification audit or legal advice, and a re-test after fixes is agreed separately.

Related research: Offensive Engineering (EXPLOIT) — We research ways to analyse and verify vulnerabilities and their impact from an attacker's perspective.